AB050. Novel treatment vs. standard of care in melanoma-associated leptomeningeal metastases: a systematic review & network meta-analysis
Abstract

AB050. Novel treatment vs. standard of care in melanoma-associated leptomeningeal metastases: a systematic review & network meta-analysis

Jia Jia Teo1, Razan Nossier1, Angad Chauhan2, Tuan Zea Tan3, Vincent Diong Weng Nga4

1Second Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand; 3Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; 4Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence to: Jia Jia Teo, Student. Second Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland. Email: angela.teojiajia2508@gmail.com.

Background: Melanoma stands as a prevalent instigator of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) within the realm of cancer. Given the poor prognosis accompanying this condition, ongoing trials explore a spectrum of treatment modalities in pursuit of more effective interventions. To ascertain the most effective therapeutic strategies, we aim to compare novel treatments against the current standard of care for melanoma-associated LMD.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science for relevant studies published from January 2014 to January 2024. We included primary research studies, including observational studies, randomised control trials, quasi-experimental design studies, clinical trials, and experimental studies focusing on LMD caused by metastatic melanoma. Data extraction was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and quality assessment/risk of bias is performed individually using the GRADE method. A network meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the effects of multiple interventions within the study. Overall survival outcomes were quantified using log hazard ratio.

Results: Out of 680 records screened for eligibility, seven carefully chosen studies, meeting our specific inclusion criteria, provide insights into the management of 397 patients grappling with LMD due to metastatic melanoma. These studies vary in design: one observational cohort study with 29 participants, a clinical trial with 25 patients, four retrospective cohort studies ranging from 39 to 190 participants and one experimental study with 24 patients.

Conclusions: Despite the escalating breakthroughs of treatment options in melanoma-associated LMD, further studies may be imperative to conclusively determine whether the newer therapeutic options yield superior outcomes compared to the current standard of care treatments.

Keywords: Melanoma; leptomeningeal disease (LMD); leptomeningeal metastasis; melanoma LMD; LMD-M


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://cco.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cco-24-ab050/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the noncommercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


Cite this abstract as: Teo JJ, Nossier R, Chauhan A, Tan TZ, Nga VDW. AB050. Novel treatment vs. standard of care in melanoma-associated leptomeningeal metastases: a systematic review & network meta-analysis. Chin Clin Oncol 2024;13(Suppl 1):AB050. doi: 10.21037/cco-24-ab050

Download Citation