AB064. Two case reports & review of literature: perioperative surgical management of symptomatic large non-functioning pituitary masses in early pregnancy
Abstract

AB064. Two case reports & review of literature: perioperative surgical management of symptomatic large non-functioning pituitary masses in early pregnancy

Emma Toh1, Zakir Chew1, Colin Teo1, Atsuha Kato2, Rikuya Aoyama3, Li Tinghu4, Nagarjun Bolem1, Vincent Diong Weng Nga1

1Division of Neurosurgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; 2Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan; 3Kobe University, Kobe, Japan; 4Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence to: Emma Toh, MBBS. Division of Neurosurgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore. Email: emmytoh@gmail.com.

Background: Pituitary masses during pregnancy pose many challenges, requiring inputs from multidisciplinary teams. Where surgery is required, such as in cases of impending pituitary apoplexy, timing must be carefully selected. Several case reports have suggested good outcome with surgery in later trimesters or postpartum. However, insufficient data exists on surgical strategies for such patients with severe visual symptoms in early pregnancy. We report two patients with pituitary masses requiring surgical excision.

Methods: Review of patients’ notes and imaging, with literature review.

Results: A 35-year-old gravida 2 para 1 female at 9 weeks gestational age (GA) presented with chronic bitemporal hemianopia, with acute left eye blurring of vision, identified during a pre-employment screening test. Imaging revealed a 38 mm × 29 mm × 33 mm sellar mass with compression onto the optic chiasm. She had no significant hormonal imbalances other than hyperprolactinemia and newly diagnosed Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. She underwent transsphenoidal resection, with histology showing pituitary adenoma with blood clots. Similarly, our second patient was a 37-year-old gravida 4 para 2 female at 12 weeks GA with worsening bitemporal hemianopia with a 25 mm × 21 mm × 18 mm sellar mass displacing and compressing the optic chiasm. After resection she had marked objective improvement in her vision, but developed diabetes insipidus, and final histology revealed pituicytoma. Preoperative considerations for timing of surgery include pituitary apoplexy or acutely worsening visual field deficit. The pituitary physiologically increases in size during pregnancy, which can compress the optic chiasm and worsen visual deficit. In the case of apoplexy, delayed identification can have devastating consequences. However, major surgery in the first trimester may increase spontaneous miscarriage. The effects of imaging investigations from radiation, or gadolinium contrast administration, are also uncertain. While surgical positioning remains unaffected, other intraoperative considerations include strictly avoiding hypotension and using pregnancy-safe agents. Postoperative considerations include correcting hormonal deficiencies of hypopituitarism, including acute central hypocortisolism, diabetes insipidus and interruption of gonadotrophin production which could negatively affect pregnancy. Fetal heart rate must also be assessed.

Conclusions: Determining timing of surgery to ensure well-being of both mother and fetus involves a difficult balance of risks. In our two cases, a thorough discussion with multidisciplinary input was required to achieve good outcomes.

Keywords: Pituitary mass; pregnancy; transsphenoidal surgery


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two patients and their families, as well as the care teams involved in the management of the two cases.

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://cco.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cco-24-ab064/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the noncommercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


Cite this abstract as: Toh E, Chew Z, Teo C, Kato A, Aoyama R, Tinghu L, Bolem N, Nga VDW. AB064. Two case reports & review of literature: perioperative surgical management of symptomatic large non-functioning pituitary masses in early pregnancy. Chin Clin Oncol 2024;13(Suppl 1):AB064. doi: 10.21037/cco-24-ab064

Download Citation