Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: a literature review
Review Article

Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: a literature review

Yidan Zhu1,2 ORCID logo, Shogo Nakamoto2,3 ORCID logo, Takahiro Tsukioki3 ORCID logo, Yuko Takahashi3 ORCID logo, Yoko Iwatani3, Tsuguo Iwatani3 ORCID logo, Xinfeng Zhang1, Maki Tanioka4 ORCID logo, Tadahiko Shien3 ORCID logo

1Department of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China; 2Department of General Thoracic Surgery and Breast and Endocrinological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan; 3Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; 4Department of Clinical AI Human Resources Development Program, Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: Y Zhu, T Shien; (II) Administrative support: Y Zhu, T Shien; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Y Zhu, T Shien; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Y Zhu, T Shien; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Y Zhu, S Nakamoto, T Shien; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Tadahiko Shien, MD, PhD. Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. Email: tshien@md.okayama-u.ac.jp.

Background and Objective: Primary angiosarcoma of the breast (PBA) is an extremely rare and heterogeneous disease. PBA is difficult to diagnose and has a poor prognosis. In order to better understand the disease and provide evidence-based treatment for PBA patients, a review of the published literature in the English language was conducted.

Methods: A literature review in agreement with the PRISMA protocol was conducted. Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for English articles on PBA patients in September 2023 with a predetermined strategy. The articles were categorized and assessed based on hierarchical levels of scientific evidence.

Key Content and Findings: A total of 255 articles were identified, among these 137 publications which included 1,888 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis. No prospective, randomized trials exclusive to PBA have been recognized. This article provides an overview of the most current and comprehensive evidence concerning the epidemiology, etiology, genomic features, clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PBA.

Conclusions: Despite the fact that current evidence is largely derived from retrospective studies, database analyses, and case reports, we utilized this information to tackle important clinical questions concerning optimal patient management practices for PBA. Complete surgical excision continues to be the mainstay treatment for PBA. However, the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies is still unclear. This narrative review highlights the urgent need for more rigorously designed research to enhance the management and treatment strategies for PBA.

Keywords: Primary angiosarcoma of the breast (PBA); complete surgical excision; hierarchal levels of scientific evidence; literature review


Submitted Feb 14, 2024. Accepted for publication Jul 08, 2024. Published online Aug 29, 2024.

doi: 10.21037/cco-24-16


Introduction

Angiosarcoma of the breast is a high-grade malignant soft tissue tumor, and it can be classified into a primary form with no known precursor and a secondary form, secondary breast angiosarcoma (SBA), with a history of primary breast diseases followed by radiotherapies (1). Primary angiosarcoma of the breast (PBA) is a malignant vascular tumor originating in the breast parenchyma. And it is a very rare disease that accounts for only 0.04% of all malignant breast tumors, with a difficult diagnosis and poor prognosis (2). PBA is difficult to study due to the low disease incidence and geographically dispersed patient populations, which resulted in considerable unmet therapeutic requirements for people with uncommon malignancies. There is little evidence of a comprehensive and systematic approach to the treatment and management of PBA. Also, PBA is easily misdiagnosed due to the rarity of the disease, the similarity of other benign diseases, and the non-specific imaging findings. Accurately diagnosing PBA is essential prior to initiating treatment. Furthermore, the existing evidence to inform clinical practice is predominantly derived from retrospective studies, database reviews, and case reports. Most of the retrospective studies included limited patients and mixed with the other diseases. Moreover, the current reported reviews about PBA are limited and were provided with limited evidence. For a greater comprehension of the disease and to evaluate evidence-based practices for the treatment of PBA, we systematically reviewed the published literature in the English language. We present this article in accordance with the Narrative Review reporting checklist (available at https://cco.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cco-24-16/rc).


Methods

The study flow of the search diagram is illustrated in Figure 1. For this narrative review, an extensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Cochrane in September 2023 (Table 1). The search strategy and data analysis methods were established prior to commencing the study. Searches were restricted to English-language publications and covered works published from 1975 onward, following the first description of primary angiosarcoma in 1976 (3). The search used the keywords “primary angiosarcoma of the breast”, “primary mammary angiosarcoma”, “angiosarcoma and breast”, and “breast angiosarcoma with no radiation exposure”. Identical articles and abstracts were identified to avoid duplication. Publications from the same institution were examined, the results from both searches were merged, and duplicate entries were eliminated. Articles with no available full text or insufficient information, research of different diseases, review articles, comment articles, and articles in different languages were excluded.

Figure 1 Search diagram.

Table 1

The search strategy summary

Items Specification
Date of search 15th September, 2023
Databases and other sources searched MEDLINE and Cochrane
Search terms used “Primary angiosarcoma of the breast”, “primary mammary angiosarcoma”, “angiosarcoma and breast”, and “breast angiosarcoma with no radiation exposure”
Timeframe From 1975 to 2023
Inclusion and exclusion criteria Inclusion: all research articles relevant to the PBA in English were included
Exclusion: no full text available, review article, insufficient information, different diseases, articles in different language
Selection process The search and selection of articles were conducted by primary authors Y.Z., S.N., and X.Z. These were then reviewed by senior authors T.T., Y.T., Y.I., T.I., M.T., and T.S.

PBA, primary angiosarcoma of the breast.


Results

A total of 255 studies or reports were identified through the implementation of the strategy predefined in the study protocol. A total of 137 studies were incorporated into the review, encompassing 1,888 patients. A notable deficiency persists in the current body of literature due to the absence of substantial evidence to inform the management of PBA. We classified and evaluated the 137 original articles in accordance with the hierarchical levels of scientific evidence as described in Table 2 by Hadorn et al. (4). The PBA patients (n=1,888) were separated into subgroups, along with their critical clinical data based on levels: (I) level 1 evidence. We found no prospective, randomized trials exclusive to PBA. Only one randomized controlled trial with mixed diseases which concentrated in all kinds of angiosarcoma (9 PBA patients included) has been conducted so far (2,5). (II) Level 3 evidence (Table 3). Thirty-six articles involving 1,759 patients with PBA are included, of which 11 articles are exclusive to PBA, including 395 patients (3). (III) Level 5 evidence (Table 4). One hundred articles involving 120 PBA patients were included. No level 2, level 4, level 6, or level 7 evidence was discovered.

Table 2

Hierarchal levels of evidence

Level Definition
Level 1 evidence Supportive evidence from well-conducted randomized controlled trials with ≥100 patients
Level 2 evidence Supportive evidence from well-conducted randomized controlled trials with <100 patients
Level 3 evidence Supportive evidence from well-conducted cohort studies
Level 4 evidence Supportive evidence from well-conducted case-control studies
Level 5 evidence Supportive evidence from poorly conducted or uncontrolled studies
Level 6 evidence Conflicting evidence with the weight of evidence supporting the recommendation
Level 7 evidence Expert opinion

Table 3

Level 3 evidence (n=1,759)

Study Type of study (n of patients diagnosed with PBA) Primary endpoint
Yan et al. 2021 (6) Single center retrospective review (n=3) Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characterization of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Ginter et al. 2014 (7) Single center retrospective review (n=17) Diagnostic utility of MYC amplification and anti-MYC immunohistochemistry staining among PBA, atypical vascular lesions, radiation-induced mammary angiosarcomas, and primary angiosarcomas of other sites
Li et al. 2023 (8) Review of database patients (n=264) Prognostic factors, overall survival, and disease-specific survival of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Bentley et al. 2023 (9) Multi-center retrospective review (n=13) The role of imaging in the diagnosis of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Bae et al. 2011* (10) Single center retrospective review (n=9) Overall survival, time from diagnosis to death
Beca et al. 2020* (11) 2 facilities retrospective review (n=10) Genomic features and distinct pathogenesis
Fraga-Guedes et al. 2015 (12) 2 facilities retrospective review (n=12) Diagnostic and prognostic role of MYC gene amplificationand protein expression among angiosarcoma and vascular lesions of the breast
Laé et al. 2015 (13) Single center retrospective review (n=15) Pathogenetic differences between primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Kim et al. 2022* (14) Single center retrospective review (n=15) Disease free survival and overall survival
Wang et al. 2017* (15) Single center retrospective review (n=36) Clinicopathologic and radiologic correlations
Wang et al. 2009 (16) 2 facilities retrospective review (n=3) Characterization of the clinicopathologic features of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Teng et al. 2023 (17) Review of database patients (n=100) Overall survival and prognostic factors of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Yin et al. 2017 (18) Review of database patients (n=218) Clinicopathological characteristics and their associations with overall survival among non-metastatic primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Nascimento et al. 2008* (19) Single center retrospective review (n=49) Prognostic factors, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival
Darre et al. 2022* (20) Single center retrospective review (n=8) Clinicopathologic and imaging features
Abdou et al. 2019 (21) Single center retrospective review (n=9) The association between survival outcomes, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Biswas et al. 2009 (22) Single center retrospective review (n=1) Overall survival and relapse-free survival of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Masai et al. 2016 (23) Single center retrospective review (n=6) Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
McClelland et al. 2019 (24) Review of database patients (n=220) Extent of resection, treatment plans and their association with overall survival in localized breast angiosarcoma
Lokanatha et al. 2018* (25) Single center retrospective review (n=4) Overall survival
Aljohani et al. 2017 (26) Single center retrospective review (n=4) Disease free survival and overall survival of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Hui et al. 2012 (27) Single center retrospective review (n=6) Loco-regional recurrence free survival of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Kronenfeld et al. 2021 (28) Single center retrospective review (n=11) Local recurrence, distant recurrence, and median overall survival of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Merino et al. 1983* (29) Single center retrospective review (n=15) Prognostic factors
Banks et al. 2021 (30) Multiple center retrospective review (n=34) Overall survival, disease-specific survival, number of recurrences, 5-year recurrences, cause of death of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Kondi-Pafiti et al. 2013 (31) Single center retrospective review (n=1) Incidence, clinical and histopathological characteristics among non-epithelial primary breast neoplasms
Pandey et al. 2015* (32) Review of database patients (n=226) Overall survival and influence of radiotherapy
Gennaro et al. 2010 (33) Single center retrospective review (n=10) Disease-free survival, overall survival and VEGFR expression of non-metastatic breast angiosarcoma
Friendrich et al. 2021 (34) Review of database patients (n=313) Prognostic factors of all breast angiosarcoma in primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Shet et al. 2006* (35) Single center retrospective review (n=12) Histological prognostic factors and c-kit expression
Gutkin et al. 2020 (36) Single center retrospective review (n=24) Overall survival and recurrence-free survival in primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Cannella et al. 2023 (37) Single center retrospective review (n=12) Recurrence-free survival and overall survival in primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Scow et al. 2010 (38) Single center retrospective review (n=27) Prognostic factors and overall survival of primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Vorburger et al. 2005 (39) Single center retrospective review (n=32) Prognostic factors, overall survival, and disease-free survival in primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma
Kunkiel et al. 2018* (40) Single center retrospective review (n=11) Clinicopathological profile, treatment, recurrence
Luini et al. 2007 (41) Single center retrospective review (n=9) Overall survival and disease-free survival in primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma

*, articles exclusive to primary angiosarcoma of the breast. MYC, myelocytomatosis oncogene; PBA, primary angiosarcoma of the breast; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

Table 4

Level 5 evidence (n=120)

Study Type of study (n of patients diagnosed with PBA) Primary endpoint
Tang et al. 2018 (42) Case report (n=1) Case report
Takenaka et al. 2009 (43) Case report (n=1) Case report
Malolan et al. 2016 (44) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Abdelhady et al. 2020 (45) Case report (n=1) Case report
Qiu et al. 2022 (46) Case report (n=1) Case report
Philip et al. 2018 (47) Case report (n=1) Case report
Babarović et al. 2011 (48) Case report (n=1) Case report
Al-salam et al. 2012 (49) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Rincón-Riveros et al. 2022 (50) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Silverman et al. 1994 (51) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Muzumder et al. 2010 (52) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Teruyama et al. 2022 (53) Case report (n=1) Case report
Mumin et al. 2021 (54) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Baum et al. 1990 (55) Case report (n=3) Case report
Alshaar et al. 2021 (56) Case report (n=1) Case report
O’Donnell et al. 2020 (57) Case report (n=1) Case report
Souza et al. 2009 (58) Case report (n=1) Case report
Yagi et al. 2021 (59) Case report (n=1) Case report
Wang et al. 2013 (60) Case report (n=1) Case report
Yang et al. 2024 (61) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Ooe et al. 2023 (62) Case report (n=1) Case report
Mahdi et al. 2018 (63) Case report (n=1) Case report
Alexandroba et al. 2014 (64) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Yang et al. 2021 (65) Case report (n=1) Case report
da Silva et al. 2018 (66) Case report (n=1) Case report
Sasahara et al. 2019 (67) Case report (n=1) Case report
Mendoza et al. 2019 (68) Case report (n=1) Case report
Bennani et al. 2013 (69) Case report (n=1) Case report
Meng et al. 2022 (70) Case report (n=1) Case report
Issar et al. 2022 (71) Case report (n=1) Case report
Burusaoat et al. 2019 (72) Case report (n=1) Case report
Im et al. 2019 (73) Case report (n=1) Case report
Lee et al. 2023 (74) Case report (n=1) Case report
Huang et al. 2023 (75) Case report (n=1) Case report
Kagawa et al. 1997 (76) Case report (n=1) Case report
Ferre et al. 2022 (77) Case report (n=1) Case report
Darré et al. 2020 (78) Case report (n=1) Case report
Vailas et al. 2015 (79) Case report (n=1) Case report
Killoran et al. 2023 (80) Case report (n=1) Case report
Dashevsky et al. 2013 (81) Case report (n=1) Case report
Combemale et al. 2016 (82) Case report (n=2) Case report
Kilic et al. 2015 (83) Case report (n=1) Case report
Tang et al. 2023 (84) Case report (n=2) Case report and literature review
Keshav et al. 2013 (85) Case report (n=1) Case report
Bender et al. 2020 (86) Case report (n=1) Case report
Palanisamy et al. 2020 (87) Case report (n=1) Case report
Varghese et al. 2019 (88) Case report (n=1) Case report
Luczynska et al. 2021 (89) Case report (n=1) Case report
Vimugdha et al. 2020 (90) Case report (n=1) Case report
Jagtap et al. 2015 (91) Case report (n=1) Case report
Rohan et al. 2010 (92) Case report (n=1) Case report
Russo et al. 2020 (93) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Mouhoub et al. 2019 (94) Case report (n=1) Case report
Christodoulakis et al. 1998 (95) Case report (n=1) Case report
Cassou-Mounat et al. 2019 (96) Case report (n=6) Case report
Kader et al. 1987 (97) Case report (n=1) Case report
Azizun-Nisa et al. 2013 (98) Case report (n=5) Case report
Qin et al. 2021 (99) Case report (n=1) Case report
Marana et al. 2000 (100) Case report (n=1) Case report
Zincone et al. 1995 (101) Case report (n=1) Case report
Rosner et al. 1988 (102) Case report (n=3) Case report
Ronzen et al. 2007 (103) Case report (n=1) Case report
Georgiannos et al. 2003 (104) Case report (n=4) Case report
Akrami et al. 2016 (105) Case report (n=1) Case report
Pramanik et al. 2017 (106) Case report (n=1) Case report
Pandey et al. 2014 (107) Case report (n=1) Case report
O’Neill et al. 2014 (108) Case report (n=1) Case report
Wang et al. 2015 (109) Case report (n=1) Case report
Maehara et al. 2017 (110) Case report (n=1) Case report
Hu et al. 2019 (111) Case report (n=1) Case report
Tomich et al. 2017 (112) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Lvoff et al. 2007 (113) Case report (n=1) Case report
Lacoponi et al. 2016 (114) Case report (n=1) Case report
Tiwary et al. 2007 (115) Case report (n=1) Case report
Taib et al. 2006 (116) Case report (n=1) Case report
Britt et al. 1995 (117) Case report (n=1) Case report
Alvarado et al. 2013 (118) Case report (n=1) Case report
Costa et al. 2012 (119) Case report (n=1) Case report
Bhosale et al. 2013 (120) Case report (n=1) Case report
Cantile et al. 2018 (121) Case report (n=3) Case report
Marchant et al. 1997 (122) Case report (n=1) Case report
Khoshim et al. 1991 (123) Case report (n=1) Case report
Cao et al. 2012 (124) Case report (n=1) Case report
Brown et al. 2020 (125) Case report (n=1) Case report
Lin et al. 2016 (126) Case report (n=1) Case report
Ohta et al. 1997 (127) Case report (n=1) Case report
Bernathova et al. 2006 (128) Case report (n=1) Case report
Farrokh et al. 2016 (129) Case report (n=1) Case report
Kamat et al. 2015 (130) Case report (n=1) Case report
van Geel et al. 2009 (131) Case report (n=1) Case report
Myerowitz et al. 1978 (132) Case report (n=1) Case report
Carter et al. 2005 (133) Case report (n=1) Case report
Zhou et al. 2009 (134) Case report (n=1) Case report
Gatcombe et al. 2010 (135) Case report (n=1) Case report
Losanoff et al. 2006 (136) Case report (n=1) Case report
Johnson et al. 2002 (137) Case report (n=1) Case report and literature review
Kiluk et al. 2005 (138) Case report (n=1) Case report
Hsiao et al. 2013 (139) Case report (n=1) Case report
Mulder et al. 2017 (140) Case report (n=1) Case report
Altan et al. 2010 (141) Case report (n=1) Case report

PBA, primary angiosarcoma of the breast.


Epidemiology and etiology

Angiosarcoma of the breast accounts for 1% of all breast tumors that occur in the soft tissues. It originates from the interconnected breast tissues and may spread to the skin above it (142). PBA is an extremely rare and heterogeneous disease that is not related to radiation exposure. Only around 20% of the mammary angiosarcomas are primary angiosarcomas, accounting for about 0.04% of all breast malignancies and 8% of breast sarcomas (27,143,144). PBA is typical of young age, compared to the SBA, which manifests suddenly and has a median onset age ranging from 30 to 50 years (34). PBA almost exclusively affects female patients, four well-documented male patients which were extremely rare were reported in the literature so far (66,130,145,146). Given the rarity of PBA, risk factors are difficult to elucidate. It is plausible that the alteration of lymphatic drainage of the breast contributes to the development of angiosarcoma in the breast (147). According to the retrospective database research by Friedrich et al., black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients were more likely to have primary angiosarcoma (34). The incidence of certain diseases varied by race and ethnicity due to genetic factors and dietary and lifestyle differences. There still exists uncertainty about other factors contributing to the development of PBA.


Genomic features

Numerous studies demonstrated that c-MYC amplification was a recurrent genetic alteration in SBA but not in PBA or atypical vascular lesions (AVL), indicating that PBA and SBA have genetically distinct pathogenetic mechanisms (7,12,148,149). Wei et al. compared the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between PBA and SBA. Out of these instances, 13 were downregulated (PGM5, IQCA1, CETP, WASF3, GCOM1, CTLA4, SLR2, MYC, RELN, UNC5A, CMBL, ICOS, CDCA7L) and five were upregulated (SERPINE1, TGM2, BNC2, LXN, and BAMBI) in PBA and the related protein-protein interaction networks of these DEGs identified the most outstanding genes including MYC, FOXP3 and SERPINE1, suggesting the potential to serve as therapeutic targets as well new biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis between PBA and SBA (150). Gennaro et al. found that vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) expression is significantly correlated with low- and intermediate-grade breast angiosarcoma, and VEGFR was also significantly more frequent in patients with PBA and younger patients, therefore suggesting anti-angiogenic treatment may represent a novel therapeutic approach in VEGFR-positive cases of this rare and aggressive disease (33,151). Teruyama et al. reported a PBA case with repeated resection and recurrence over 15 years. Germline mutations linked to malignancy were identified through a comprehensive genetic mutation analysis conducted throughout the progression of the disease. Notable mutations identified included single nucleotide polymorphisms in the tumor protein p53 (TP53), kinase insert domain receptor (KDR), and fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4). PBA is an aggressive disease and has a high chance of local recurrence and metastasis. Although many metastasized tumors had been reported to inherit driver gene mutations from the primary tumor, this particular case did not exhibit any driver gene mutations associated with angiosarcoma that had been previously documented (53). There was clear evidence of genetic heterogeneity among PBA; therefore, additional research is required to determine the oncogenic trigger events that are distinct to this subset of tumors.


Clinical presentation and diagnosis

Patient with PBA usually presents a rapidly growing painless and palpable mass in a relatively larger size. PBA usually manifests with bluish, reddish, violaceous, or black skin discoloration, yet the discoloration may be mistaken for bruising, leading to a delayed diagnosis (143,152-155). Angiosarcoma is characterized by its highly aggressive nature, frequent multicentric presentation, which may indicate localized metastasis or locoregional dissemination, and its propensity for distant metastasis. Mammography and ultrasound often lead to misdiagnosis since the image findings are non-specific and because of the dense breast parenchyma (92). In comparison, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with dynamic contrast enhancement is more informative. PBA typically exhibits moderate intensity on T1-weighted images and high intensity on T2-weighted images on MRI. Angiosarcomas of low-grade exhibit progressive enlargement. High-grade angiosarcomas are characterized by frequent visualization of large draining vessels and rapid enhancement and discharge. In conjunction with numerous unenhanced regions within the tumor, these results may be indicative of angiosarcoma (108,142,156,157). Three grades of angiosarcoma were described (2). Multiple grades may exist in the same tumor; therefore, a complete excision and careful histologic evaluation are needed to accurately determine the tumor grade (152). Histologically, the PBA is often composed of well-formed vascular spaces and appears deceptively benign. Consequently, the accurate diagnosis of breast angiosarcoma poses a frequent challenge in clinical practice. The lesions were misdiagnosed as hemangioma, lymphangioma, hematoma, or dysplasia. Percutaneous biopsy frequently yields a false negative conclusion (92,158). Immunohistochemical staining for CD31, CD34, vascular markers factor VIII, and Fli-1 is a valuable technique in the identification and localization of specific proteins or antigens within tissue samples (69,159,160). A clear clinical history in conjunction with clinical, radiological and pathological findings is essential for establishing an early and accurate diagnosis.


Treatment

Complete surgical excision is the gold standard treatment for patients with PBA. However, there is no compelling evidence for us to make a conclusive recommendation on the total mastectomy or breast-conserving treatment. Patients with smaller tumors may benefit from wide local excision surgery (10,11,67). Only isolated cases are reported to have lymphatic spread and the PBA is thought to be hematogenous metastasis (136). Presently, the necessity of axillary nodal dissection is unknown, and the node dissection is controversial unless clinically positive nodes are identified (14,161). Regardless of the rarity of PBA, there is no international consensus on the role of neoadjuvant, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. McClelland et al. conducted a database review and concluded adjuvant therapies are not associated with improved survival, except for the possible role of adjuvant chemotherapy in large primary tumors (24). A meta-analysis of patients treated with doxorubicin and a randomized trial of epirubicin plus ifosfamide exhibited longer disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) (162). Survival may be enhanced and locoregional control could benefit from hyperfractionated radiotherapy (161,163,164). Also, as was mentioned in the above paragraph on ‘genomic features’, several genes provide the potential to serve as therapeutic targets to improve the prognosis. Further investigations, preferably prospective clinical studies are needed.


Prognosis

The median OS was 38 months and the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS with PBA was 80%, 39%, and 25%, respectively (17). The incidence of distant metastasis was considerable, affecting around 60% of the patients. Skin, lungs, liver, and bones emerged as the most frequent sites of metastasis (19). The prognosis of PBA, like the other types of sarcomas, is proposed to be related to the tumor size, the tumor grade, and the resection margin status (69). The most frequently discussed and controversial prognostic factor is grade. It was believed that the histologic grade of the tumor in PBA played a pivotal role in predicting (10,67) patients’ prognosis (35,152,153). Regardless of grade, PBA demonstrated a high propensity for metastasis and a high risk of tumor-related mortality. Nascimento et al. proposed that there was no correlation between the histologic grade of the tumors and the probability of distal metastasis, local recurrence, or mortality in their series, which contradicts previous findings (19).


Conclusions

PBA is a rare breast neoplasm that impacts the younger females, and it is characterized by its challenging diagnostic criteria and unfavorable prognosis. This review of PBA evaluated the epidemiology, etiology, genomic features, clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis for this rare disease. No published articles presented evidence exclusive to PBA at levels 1 or 2. Thus, no adequate evidence is available to guide clinicians. Complete surgical excision continues to be the principal approach in managing PBA. Regrettably, the exact role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is still unknown. Adjuvant therapies could be offered for residual microscopic diseases after surgery. This review emphasizes the necessity for additional meticulously designed studies to educate the management and efficiently direct the treatment of PBA.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the Narrative Review reporting checklist. Available at https://cco.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cco-24-16/rc

Peer Review File: Available at https://cco.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cco-24-16/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://cco.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cco-24-16/coif). M.T. receives grants or contracts from Celltrion, Pfizer, and Eisai. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Arora TK, Terracina KP, Soong J, et al. Primary and secondary angiosarcoma of the breast. Gland Surg 2014;3:28-34. [PubMed]
  2. Hodgson NC, Bowen-Wells C, Moffat F, et al. Angiosarcomas of the breast: a review of 70 cases. Am J Clin Oncol 2007;30:570-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Dunegan LJ, Tobon H, Watson CG. Angiosarcoma of the breast: a report of two cases and a review of the literature. Surgery 1976;79:57-9. [PubMed]
  4. Hadorn DC, Baker D, Hodges JS, et al. Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:749-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Painter CA, Jain E, Tomson BN, et al. The Angiosarcoma Project: enabling genomic and clinical discoveries in a rare cancer through patient-partnered research. Nat Med 2020;26:181-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Yan M, Gilmore H, Bomeisl P, et al. Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of breast angiosarcoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2021;54:151795. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Ginter PS, Mosquera JM, MacDonald TY, et al. Diagnostic utility of MYC amplification and anti-MYC immunohistochemistry in atypical vascular lesions, primary or radiation-induced mammary angiosarcomas, and primary angiosarcomas of other sites. Hum Pathol 2014;45:709-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Li J, Li Y, Wang Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with angiosarcoma of breast. Cancer Med 2023;12:13397-407. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Bentley H, Roberts J, Hayes M, et al. The Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Primary and Secondary Breast Angiosarcoma: Twenty-Five-Year Experience of a Provincial Cancer Institution. Clin Breast Cancer 2023;23:e45-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Bae SY, Choi MY, Cho DH, et al. Large clinical experience of primary angiosarcoma of the breast in a single Korean medical institute. World J Surg 2011;35:2417-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Beca F, Krings G, Chen YY, et al. Primary mammary angiosarcomas harbor frequent mutations in KDR and PIK3CA and show evidence of distinct pathogenesis. Mod Pathol 2020;33:1518-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Fraga-Guedes C, André S, Mastropasqua MG, et al. Angiosarcoma and atypical vascular lesions of the breast: diagnostic and prognostic role of MYC gene amplification and protein expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;151:131-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Laé M, Lebel A, Hamel-Viard F, et al. Can c-myc amplification reliably discriminate postradiation from primary angiosarcoma of the breast? Cancer Radiother 2015;19:168-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Kim YJ, Ryu JM, Lee SK, et al. Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in Korea. Curr Oncol 2022;29:3272-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Wang L, Lao IW, Yu L, et al. Primary Breast Angiosarcoma: A Retrospective Study of 36 Cases from a Single Chinese Medical Institute with Clinicopathologic and Radiologic Correlations. Breast J 2017;23:282-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Wang XY, Jakowski J, Tawfik OW, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic analysis of cases from the last 10 years. Ann Diagn Pathol 2009;13:147-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Teng L, Yan S, Du J, et al. Clinicopathological analysis and prognostic treatment study of angiosarcoma of the breast: a SEER population-based analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2023;21:144. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Yin M, Wang W, Drabick JJ, et al. Prognosis and treatment of non-metastatic primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma: a comparative study. BMC Cancer 2017;17:295. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Nascimento AF, Raut CP, Fletcher CD. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: clinicopathologic analysis of 49 cases, suggesting that grade is not prognostic. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:1896-904. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Darre T, Djiwa T, N'Timon B, et al. Breast Primary Angiosarcoma: A Clinicopathologic and Imaging Study of a Series Cases. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2022;16:11782234221086726. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Abdou Y, Elkhanany A, Attwood K, et al. Primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma: single center report and a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;178:523-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Biswas T, Tang P, Muhs A, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast: a rare clinicopathological entity. Am J Clin Oncol 2009;32:582-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Masai K, Kinoshita T, Jimbo K, et al. Clinicopathological features of breast angiosarcoma. Breast Cancer 2016;23:718-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. McClelland S 3rd, Hatfield J, Degnin C, et al. Extent of resection and role of adjuvant treatment in resected localized breast angiosarcoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;175:409-18. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Lokanatha D, Anand A, Lakshmaiah KC, et al. Primary breast angiosarcoma - a single institution experience from a tertiary cancer center in South India. Breast Dis 2018;37:133-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Aljohani B, Al-Twajeri T, Alameer A, et al. Clinicopathological features of breast angiosarcoma: A 16-years single-institution experience. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017;37:211-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. Hui A, Henderson M, Speakman D, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast: a difficult surgical challenge. Breast 2012;21:584-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. Kronenfeld JP, Crystal JS, Ryon EL, et al. Clinical Outcomes for Primary and Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma of the Breast with Multimodal Treatment: Long-Term Survival Is Achievable. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:3814. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. Merino MJ, Carter D, Berman M. Angiosarcoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 1983;7:53-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  30. Banks J, George J, Potter S, et al. Breast Angiosarcoma Surveillance Study: UK national audit of management and outcomes of angiosarcoma of the breast and chest wall. Br J Surg 2021;108:388-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  31. Kondi-Pafiti A, Dellaportas D, Myoteri D, et al. Rare non-epithelial primary breast neoplasms: a ten-year experience at a Greek University Hospital. J BUON 2013;18:70-6. [PubMed]
  32. Pandey M, Sutton GR, Giri S, et al. Grade and Prognosis in Localized Primary Angiosarcoma. Clin Breast Cancer 2015;15:266-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  33. Gennaro M, Valeri B, Casalini P, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Tumori 2010;96:930-5. [PubMed]
  34. Friedrich AU, Reisenbichler ES, Heller DR, et al. Characteristics and Long-Term Risk of Breast Angiosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:5112-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  35. Shet T, Malaviya A, Nadkarni M, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: observations in Asian Indian women. J Surg Oncol 2006;94:368-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  36. Gutkin PM, Ganjoo KN, Lohman M, et al. Angiosarcoma of the Breast: Management and Outcomes. Am J Clin Oncol 2020;43:820-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  37. Cannella L, Perri F, Clemente O, et al. The Complex Management of the Breast Angiosarcoma: A Retrospective Study. Oncology 2023;101:234-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  38. Scow JS, Reynolds CA, Degnim AC, et al. Primary and secondary angiosarcoma of the breast: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Surg Oncol 2010;101:401-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  39. Vorburger SA, Xing Y, Hunt KK, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast. Cancer 2005;104:2682-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  40. Kunkiel M, Maczkiewicz M, Jagiełło-Gruszfeld A, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast-series of 11 consecutive cases-a single-centre experience. Curr Oncol 2018;25:e50-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  41. Luini A, Gatti G, Diaz J, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and a review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007;105:81-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  42. Tang T, Li H. Repeated resection-associated breast angiosarcoma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e12513. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  43. Takenaka M, Tanaka M, Isobe M, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast with silicone granuloma: a case report. Kurume Med J 2009;56:33-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  44. Malolan A, Chowdary PB, Sadashivaiah SB. Recurrent Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast Presenting as Kasabach-Merritt Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of Literature. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:XD04-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  45. Abdelhady AM, Neamaalla S, Gittens AS, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: Case report of a rare vascular tumor. Radiol Case Rep 2020;15:339-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  46. Qiu S, Zou S, Cheng S, et al. Positive FAPI PET/CT in a Bilateral Mammary Angiosarcoma Patient With Less Impressive FDG PET/CT Images. Clin Nucl Med 2022;47:648-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  47. Philip J, Bender E, Waite K. Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast after Bilateral Breast Reduction. Case Rep Surg 2018;2018:7390987. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  48. Babarović E, Zamolo G, Mustać E, et al. High grade angiosarcoma arising in fibroadenoma. Diagn Pathol 2011;6:125. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  49. Al-Salam S, Balalaa N, Faour I, et al. HIF-1α, VEGF and WT-1 are protagonists in bilateral primary angiosarcoma of breast: a case report and review of literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2012;5:247-53. [PubMed]
  50. Rincón-Riveros A, De la Peña J, Rubiano W, et al. Primary Breast Angiosarcoma: Comparative Transcriptome Analysis. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:16032. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  51. Silverman LR, Deligdisch L, Mandeli J, et al. Chemotherapy for angiosarcoma of the breast: case report of 30-year survival and analysis of the literature. Cancer Invest 1994;12:145-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  52. Muzumder S, Das P, Kumar M, et al. Primary epithelioid angiosarcoma of the breast masquerading as carcinoma. Curr Oncol 2010;17:64-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  53. Teruyama F, Kuno A, Murata Y, et al. Mutational landscape of primary breast angiosarcoma with repeated resection and recurrence over a 15-year period: A case report. Pathol Int 2022;72:457-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  54. Mumin NA, Rahmat K, Hamid MTR, et al. Primary Breast Angiosarcoma: Utilisation of Pre-surgical Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Accurate Tumour Characterization and Planning - A Case Report and Literature Review. Curr Med Imaging 2021;17:552-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  55. Baum JK, Levine AJ, Ingold JA. Angiosarcoma of the breast with report of unusual site of first metastasis. J Surg Oncol 1990;43:125-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  56. Alshaar M, Alkhatib M, Sara S, et al. Primary breast angiosarcoma resembling a common benign tumor: A case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021;65:102281. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  57. O'Donnell JP, Sugrue R, McLaughlin R, et al. Multidisciplinary approach to chest wall reconstruction in primary breast angiosarcoma resection. BMJ Case Rep 2020;13:e233156. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  58. Souza FF, Katkar A, den Abbeele AD, et al. Breast angiosarcoma metastatic to the ovary. Case Rep Med 2009;2009:381015. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  59. Yagi T, Nakamura H, Wakamatsu T, et al. Primary breast angiosarcoma with disseminated intravascular coagulation is successfully treated with self-subcutaneous unfractionated heparin calcium injection: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2021;14:104. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  60. Wang J, Fisher C, Thway K. Angiosarcoma of the Breast with Solitary Metastasis to the Ovary during Pregnancy: An Uncommon Pattern of Metastatic Disease. Case Rep Oncol Med 2013;2013:209610. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  61. Yang Y, Dong Y, Wu J, et al. Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: A Diagnostic Challenge. Int J Surg Pathol 2024;32:368-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  62. Ooe Y, Terakawa H, Kawashima H, et al. Bilateral primary angiosarcoma of the breast: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2023;17:60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  63. Mahdi Y, Rouas L, Malihy A, et al. Diagnostic difficulties of primary angiosarcoma of the breast: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2018;12:228. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  64. Alexandrova E, Sergieva S, Mihaylova I, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast complicated by the syndrome of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC): Case report and literature review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2013;19:221-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  65. Yang OO, Lan T, He JL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of a recurrent primary breast angiosarcoma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:e24625. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  66. da Silva BB, Eulálio Filho WMN, Costa PVL, et al. A rare case of primary breast angiosarcoma in a male: a case report. BMC Cancer 2018;18:978. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  67. Sasahara A, Tanabe M, Hayashi K, et al. A case of primary breast angiosarcoma with multiple discontinuous small lesions. Surg Case Rep 2019;5:157. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  68. Mendoza R, Loukeris K. Primary Epithelioid Angiosarcoma of the Breast: A Rare and Challenging Biopsy Diagnosis. Am J Case Rep 2019;20:437-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  69. Bennani A, Chbani L, Lamchahab M, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: a case report. Diagn Pathol 2013;8:66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  70. Meng T, Zhou Y, Ye MN, et al. Primary highly differentiated breast angiosarcoma in an adolescent girl. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022;26:1299-303. [PubMed]
  71. Issar P, M R, Dewangan M, et al. Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast: A Rare Case Report in Postmenopausal Women. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2022;32:607-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  72. Burusapat C, Wongprakob N, Sapruangthong R, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast presenting with a benign vascular skin-like lesion and expanding hematoma: a case report of an extremely rare tumor. J Surg Case Rep 2019;2019:rjz223. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  73. Im S, Chae BJ, Kim SH, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: a case report. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2019;12:664-8. [PubMed]
  74. Lee C, Falkner N, Kamyab R, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast in an early adolescent female. BMJ Case Rep 2023;16:e254283. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  75. Huang J, Xian D, Zhou Y, et al. A case report of primary angiosarcoma of the breast. Transl Cancer Res 2023;12:1033-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  76. Kagawa Y, Saeki T, Takiyama W, et al. Angiosarcoma of the Breast: Report of Case and Autopsy Findings. Breast Cancer 1997;4:33-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  77. Ferre R, Kuzmiak CM. A rare presentation of pregnancy associated primary angiosarcoma of the breasts. Radiol Case Rep 2022;17:2708-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  78. Darré T, Brun LVC, Seidou F, et al. Giant primary angiosarcoma of an adolescent girl's breast diagnosed postmortem: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2020;14:80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  79. Vailas MG, Vernadakis S, Moris D, et al. Surgical Dead End in a Renal Transplant Recipient Associated With a Rare Thrombohemorrhagic Syndrome. Transplant Proc 2015;47:2537-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  80. Killoran C, Dissanayake T. Primary breast angiosarcoma in a postmenopausal woman: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2023;110:108700. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  81. Dashevsky BZ, Charnoff-Katz K, Shin SJ, et al. A case of primary breast angiosarcoma. Radiol Case Rep 2015;8:741. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  82. Combemale P, Hetu J, Aubriot-Lorton MH, et al. Cutaneous lesions in sporadic angiosarcomas of the breast: a misleading presentation. Eur J Dermatol 2016;26:287-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  83. Kilic F, Kandemirli SG, Er ME, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: Diagnosis with computer-assisted MRI-guided radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) technique. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015;96:1203-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  84. Tang C, Zhan C, Qin Y, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: Two case reports and brief review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep 2023;18:1671-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  85. Keshav P, Hegde SS. Bilateral primary angiosarcoma of the breast. Case Rep Surg 2013;2013:139276. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  86. Bender L, Gantzer J, Somme F, et al. Complete Response of a Pleural, Hepatic, and Splenic Metastatic Primary Breast Angiosarcoma Using Gemcitabine Monotherapy. JCO Oncol Pract 2020;16:181-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  87. Palanisamy P, Dev B, Gnanavel H, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast with multifocal metastasis to contralateral breast: A diagnostic enigma. Breast J 2020;26:2237-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  88. Varghese B, Deshpande P, Dixit S, et al. Primary Angiosarcoma Of the Breast: A Case Report. J Radiol Case Rep 2019;13:15-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  89. Luczynska E, Rudnicki W, Kargol J, et al. Primary bilateral angiosarcoma of the breast treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with propranolol. Breast J 2021;27:781-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  90. Vimugdha P, Shubhangi A, Anjum S, et al. Primary breast angiosarcoma in a postmenopausal female. Breast J 2020;26:2257-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  91. Jagtap SV, Shukla D, Bonde VS, et al. Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast: An Uncommon Histopathological Subtype. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ED05-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  92. Rohan VS, Hanji AM, Patel JJ, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast in a postmenopausal patient. J Cancer Res Ther 2010;6:120-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  93. Russo D, Campanino MR, Cepurnaite R, et al. Primary High-Grade Angiosarcoma of the Breast in a Young Woman With Breast Implants: A Rare Case and a Review of Literature. Int J Surg Pathol 2020;28:906-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  94. Mouhoub M, Miry A, Haloui A, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: a case report. Pan Afr Med J 2019;33:134. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  95. Christodoulakis M, Gontikakis E, Giannikaki E, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol 1998;24:76-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  96. Cassou-Mounat T, Champion L, Bozec L, et al. Primary and Secondary Breast Angiosarcoma: FDG PET/CT Series. Clin Nucl Med 2019;44:e33-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  97. Kader HA, Bolger JJ, Goepel JR. Bilateral pneumothorax secondary to metastatic angiosarcoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 1987;38:201-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  98. Azizun-Nisa. Zeeshanuddin, Kayani N. Malignant vascular tumours associatedwith the breast: a study of 7 cases. J Pak Med Assoc 2013;63:646-9. [PubMed]
  99. Qin X, Wu Y, Yu L, et al. Metastasis of primary breast angiosarcoma to axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes: a rare case diagnosed using imaging data. J Int Med Res 2021;49:3000605211002337. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  100. Marana HR, de Andrade JM. Hemangiosarcoma of the breast followed by term pregnancy. Tumori 2000;86:166-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  101. Zincone GE, Perego P, Rossi GM, et al. A case of breast angiosarcoma: diagnostic imaging and review of the literature. Tumori 1995;81:387-96. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  102. Rosner D. Angiosarcoma of the breast: long-term survival following adjuvant chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 1988;39:90-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  103. Rozen WM, Mann GB. Angiosarcoma arising in an unirradiated breast with subsequent pituitary metastasis. Clin Breast Cancer 2007;7:811-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  104. Georgiannos SN, Sheaff M. Angiosarcoma of the breast: a 30 year perspective with an optimistic outlook. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:129-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  105. Akrami M, Mohammadipour M, Mokhtari M, et al. Exsanguinating Hemorrhage during Open Biopsy in a Primary Breast Angiosarcoma: A Case Report. Iran J Med Sci 2016;41:154-6. [PubMed]
  106. Pramanik R, Gogia A, Malik PS, et al. Metastatic Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast: Can We Tame It the Metronomic Way. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2017;38:228-31. [PubMed]
  107. Pandey M, Martin MG. Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast: A Case Report and Review of Literature. World J Oncol 2014;5:144-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  108. O'Neill AC, D'Arcy C, McDermott E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances in primary and secondary angiosarcoma of the breast. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2014;58:208-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  109. Wang L, Huang C, Yang X, et al. Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast with Pulmonary Metastasis. Breast J 2015;21:435-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  110. Maehara E, Mitoma C, Tsuji G, et al. Breast angiosarcoma without radiation history, putatively associated with subclinical lymphedema: A case report and review of the Japanese literature. J Dermatol 2017;44:e266-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  111. Hu CC, Chang TH, Hsu HH. Case of low-grade primary angiosarcoma of the breast with early recurrence. Breast J 2019;25:502-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  112. Tomich J, Grove Nigro K, Barr RG. Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Ultrasound Q 2017;33:46-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  113. Lvoff NM, Leung JW. Case of the season: primary angiosarcoma of the breast: correlative imaging and pathology. Semin Roentgenol 2007;42:208-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  114. Iacoponi S, Calleja J, Hernandez G, et al. Primary breast angiosarcoma in a young woman. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016;24:101-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  115. Tiwary SK, Singh MK, Prasad R, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast. Surgery 2007;141:821-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  116. Taib N, Yip Ch, Ranganathan S, et al. Haemorrhaging lesion in the breast: is there a role for embolisation? Biomed Imaging Interv J 2006;2:e30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  117. Britt LD, Lambert P, Sharma R, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast. Initial misdiagnosis is still common. Arch Surg 1995;130:221-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  118. Alvarado-Miranda A, Bacon-Fonseca L, Ulises Lara-Medina F, et al. Thalidomide combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in angiosarcoma of the breast with complete pathologic response: case report and review of literature. Breast Care (Basel) 2013;8:74-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  119. Costa S, Graça SA, Ferreira A, et al. Breast angiosarcoma secondary to phyllodes tumour. BMJ Case Rep 2012;2012:bcr2012007545. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  120. Bhosale SJ, Kshirsagar AY, Patil MV, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of breast: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2013;4:362-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  121. Cantile M, Di Bonito M, Cerrone M, et al. Primary breast angiosarcoma in young women from the same geographic region in a short period of time: Only a coincidence or an increased risk? Breast J 2018;24:91-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  122. Marchant LK, Orel SG, Perez-Jaffe LA, et al. Bilateral angiosarcoma of the breast on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1009-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  123. Khoshim M, Sadiq S, Ajarim D, et al. Bilateral angiosarcoma of the breast--a case report. Jpn J Surg 1991;21:693-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  124. Cao Y, Panos L, Graham RL, et al. Primary cutaneous angiosarcoma of the breast after breast trauma. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2012;25:70-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  125. Brown AL, Wahab RA. MRI of Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast. Radiology 2020;297:31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  126. Lin WM, Juan YH, Lin YC, et al. Awareness of primary spontaneous hemorrhagic angiosarcoma of the breast associated with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome in a pregnant woman by enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A CARE-compliant case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e5276. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  127. Ohta M, Tokuda Y, Kuge S, et al. A case of angiosarcoma of the breast. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1997;27:91-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  128. Bernathova M, Jaschke W, Pechlahner C, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast associated Kasabach-Merritt syndrome during pregnancy. Breast 2006;15:255-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  129. Farrokh D, Modoodi E, Fallah Rastegar Y. Breast Angiosarcoma with Exophytic Growth. Arch Iran Med 2016;19:812-5. [PubMed]
  130. Kamat L, Rosa M, Weinfurtner R, et al. Primary Breast Angiosarcoma in a Male. Breast J 2015;21:545-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  131. van Geel AN, den Bakker MA. Bilateral angiosarcoma of the breast in a fourteen-year-old child. Rare Tumors 2009;1:e38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  132. Myerowitz RL, Pietruszka M, Barnes EL. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast. JAMA 1978;239:403. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  133. Carter E, Ulusaraç O, Dyess DL. Axillary lymph node involvement in primary epithelioid angiosarcoma of the breast. Breast J 2005;11:219-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  134. Zhou SA, Wei H, Ding K. A Rare Case of Metachronous Bilateral Angiosarcoma of the Breast. Breast Care (Basel) 2009;4:405-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  135. Gatcombe HG, Olson TA, Esiashvili N. Metastatic primary angiosarcoma of the breast in a pediatric patient with a complete response to systemic chemotherapy and definitive radiation therapy: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2010;32:192-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  136. Losanoff JE, Jaber S, Esuba M, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: do enlarged axillary nodes matter? Breast J 2006;12:371-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  137. Johnson CM, Garguilo GA. Angiosarcoma of the breast: A case report and literature review. Curr Surg 2002;59:490-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  138. Kiluk JV, Yeh KA. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast. Breast J 2005;11:517-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  139. Hsiao CH, Yeh KH, Chang YC, et al. High-dose tamoxifen plus ifosfamide and anthracycline in a patient with angiosarcoma of the breast. West Indian Med J 2013;62:651-3. [PubMed]
  140. Mulder L, Liu S, Kopkash K, et al. Primary Synchronous Bilateral Angiosarcoma of the Breast. Am Surg 2017;83:e476-477. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  141. Altan E, Arslan C, Dede D, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast after pregnancy. Am Surg 2010;76:E115. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  142. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Kaufman RJ, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast. Radiology 1992;183:649-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  143. Yang WT, Hennessy BT, Dryden MJ, et al. Mammary angiosarcomas: imaging findings in 24 patients. Radiology 2007;242:725-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  144. Desbiens C, Hogue JC, Lévesque Y. Primary breast angiosarcoma: avoiding a common trap. Case Rep Oncol Med 2011;2011:517047. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  145. Wang ZS, Zhan N, Xiong CL, et al. Primary epithelioid angiosarcoma of the male breast: report of a case. Surg Today 2007;37:782-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  146. Granier G, Lemoine MC, Mares P, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the male breast. Ann Pathol 2005;25:235-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  147. Janse AJ, van Coevorden F, Peterse H, et al. Lymphedema-induced lymphangiosarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1995;21:155-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  148. Manner J, Radlwimmer B, Hohenberger P, et al. MYC high level gene amplification is a distinctive feature of angiosarcomas after irradiation or chronic lymphedema. Am J Pathol 2010;176:34-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  149. Guo T, Zhang L, Chang NE, et al. Consistent MYC and FLT4 gene amplification in radiation-induced angiosarcoma but not in other radiation-associated atypical vascular lesions. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011;50:25-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  150. Wei Y, Yang X, Gao L, et al. Differences in potential key genes and pathways between primary and radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast. Transl Oncol 2022;19:101385. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  151. Yates LR, Knappskog S, Wedge D, et al. Genomic Evolution of Breast Cancer Metastasis and Relapse. Cancer Cell 2017;32:169-184.e7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  152. Donnell RM, Rosen PP, Lieberman PH, et al. Angiosarcoma and other vascular tumors of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 1981;5:629-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  153. Rosen PP, Kimmel M, Ernsberger D. Mammary angiosarcoma. The prognostic significance of tumor differentiation. Cancer 1988;62:2145-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  154. Chen KT, Kirkegaard DD, Bocian JJ. Angiosarcoma of the breast. Cancer 1980;46:368-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  155. Glazebrook KN, Morton MJ, Reynolds C. Vascular tumors of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and MRI appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:331-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  156. Adem C, Reynolds C, Ingle JN, et al. Primary breast sarcoma: clinicopathologic series from the Mayo Clinic and review of the literature. Br J Cancer 2004;91:237-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  157. Kikawa Y, Konishi Y, Nakamoto Y, et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast - specific findings of MRI. Breast Cancer 2006;13:369-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  158. Lim RF, Goei R. Best cases from the AFIP: angiosarcoma of the breast. Radiographics 2007;27:S125-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  159. Hart J, Mandavilli S. Epithelioid angiosarcoma: a brief diagnostic review and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135:268-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  160. Folpe AL, Chand EM, Goldblum JR, et al. Expression of Fli-1, a nuclear transcription factor, distinguishes vascular neoplasms from potential mimics. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:1061-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  161. Sher T, Hennessy BT, Valero V, et al. Primary angiosarcomas of the breast. Cancer 2007;110:173-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  162. Pervaiz N, Colterjohn N, Farrokhyar F, et al. A systematic meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer 2008;113:573-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  163. Johnstone PA, Pierce LJ, Merino MJ, et al. Primary soft tissue sarcomas of the breast: local-regional control with post-operative radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:671-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  164. Fodor J, Orosz Z, Szabó E, et al. Angiosarcoma after conservation treatment for breast carcinoma: our experience and a review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;54:499-504. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Zhu Y, Nakamoto S, Tsukioki T, Takahashi Y, Iwatani Y, Iwatani T, Zhang X, Tanioka M, Shien T. Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: a literature review. Chin Clin Oncol 2024;13(5):68. doi: 10.21037/cco-24-16

Download Citation